Re: review: FDW API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: review: FDW API
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinwTnxh5JHd69=tD3u7gLzy_C12P00BCg58PDTq@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: review: FDW API  (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote:
>> * Is there any use case for changing the handler or validator function
>> of an existign FDW with ALTER? To me it just seems like an unnecessary
>> complication.
>
> AFAICS, the only case for that is upgrading FDW to new one without
> re-creating foreign tables.  I don't have strong opinion for this
> issue, and it seems reasonable to remove ALTER feature in first
> version.

-1.  I don't think that removing the ability to change this is going
to save a measurable amount of complexity, and it certainly will suck
if you need it and don't have it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shigeru HANADA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: FDW API
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSI patch version 14