Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTintU_j-9kkz+iKwNPbm+u9t8ahEiT+1qsr=+f6R@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Ответы Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Le 24/08/2010 13:01, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This "disqualifies" pgAdmin3 from quite a lot of platforms. There
>>>> aren't that many that are on 8.4+ yet :-(
>>>
>>> If the packagers are willing to update pgAdmin to 1.12, it seems
>>> highly likely that they'll also update their PostgreSQL package to
>>> 8.4+ too. The distros with a conservative update policy (like Debian
>>> Stable) won't update either.
>>
>> It's probably going to make it very hard for a backports repository to
>> carry it though :( But I guess it could keep a backport of libpq as
>> well, since it's always backwards compatible.
>>
>
> Can't we just have it set a variable we could check with a #ifdef? We
> don't use PQconninfoParse in many files (actually, two). So it would be
> pretty easy to add the #ifdef line, so that it won't be a big issue for
> packagers.

Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Sorry for re-opening this
discussion, but is my reading correct that we are *only* using it to
figure out if we have libpq version 9?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4