On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Why does it? I just explained a design where that wasn't required.
Hmm.. my expression might have been ambiguous. Walreceiver still needs
to wait for WAL flush by walwriter *before* sending the ACK to the master,
in #3 case. Because, in #3, the master has to wait until the standby has
flushed the WAL.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center