On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need,
> and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the
> main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've
> collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1,
> THEN we put it in the main docs.
>
> We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup
> which isn't 100% tested.
The procedure has been since 8.2. We should remove it from the documents
since 8.2?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center