On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So nevermind that distraction. I'm back to thinking that fix1 is
>> the way to go.
>
> Agreed.
>
> It's uncontroversial to have a simple guard against corrupting an
> uninitialized page, and uncontroversial is good for things that will be
> back-patched.
Here's a version of Jeff's fix1 patch (with a trivial change to the
comment) that applies to HEAD, REL9_0_STABLE, REL8_4_STABLE, and
REL8_3_STABLE; a slightly modified version that applies to
REL8_2_STABLE; and another slightly modified version that applies to
REL8_1_STABLE and REL8_0_STABLE. REL7_4_STABLE doesn't have
tablespaces, so the problem can't manifest there, I think.
I'm currently compiling and testing all of these. When that's done,
should I go ahead and check this in, or wait until after beta4 wraps?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company