Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTin_98H58DNrPfjmo2M=k33ewYfiUAAYTm6yL9R+@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 09:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Not having to have a hard limit on the space for unconsumed messages?
>
> Ah, I see. However, spilling to disk is unwanted for the current use cases
> of imessages. Instead the sender needs to be able to deal with
> out-of-(that-specific-part-of-shared)-memory conditions.

Shared memory can be paged out, too, if it's not being used enough to
keep the OS from deciding to evict it.  And I/O to a mmap()'d file or
shared memory region can remain in RAM.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: refactoring comment.c