Re: max_wal_senders must die

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Wultsch
Тема Re: max_wal_senders must die
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinXUXoAGaf_nmaWoNw69UiuDVqO3AKh4qpkSe1n@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: max_wal_senders must die  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2010 09:06 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
>>>> I think Magnus's idea to bump the default to 5 triages the worst of the
>>>> annoyance here, without dropping the feature (which has uses) or waiting
>>>> for new development to complete.
>
>> Setting max_wal_senders to a non-zero value causes additional work to
>> be done every time a transaction commits, aborts, or is prepared.
>
> Yes.  This isn't just a numeric parameter; it's also a boolean
> indicating "do I want to pay the overhead to be prepared to be a
> replication master?".  Josh has completely failed to make a case that
> that should be the default.  In fact, the system would fail to start
> at all if we just changed the default for max_wal_senders and not the
> default for wal_level.
>
>                        regards, tom lane

If the variable is altered such that it is dynamic, could it not be
updated by the postmaster when a connection attempts to begin
replicating?

--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch@gmail.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Следующее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: knngist plans