Re: "writable CTEs"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: "writable CTEs"
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinWSF1nN1vSVNzXFSTE7f8sSjy6-H-DB=53e7W+@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: "writable CTEs"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 28 December 2010 12:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:45 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>> I don't see how people can be relying on links to 9.1-to-be's
>> documentation.
>
> Well, it's always handy when the filenames are the same across
> versions.  Ever looked at the 9.0 documentation for something and then
> modified the URL to see what it looked like in 8.1 or something?

I do this all the time. Anyway, I intend for this doc patch to be
backported to 8.4 as a bugfix, which is part of the reason why it
isn't invasive - it's just a clarification. Clearly if it makes sense
for 9.1, it makes just as much sense for 9.0 and 8.4.

> No, actually I think Peter has it right.  A query with one or more
> common table expressions is a WITH-query.  This is a subtle difference
> but could affect the way that things are phrased in the documentation.

Attached is a new patch written with this consideration in mind. It
also has an acronym.sgml entry for CTE, which was absent from my
earlier patch. I think David actually agreed that I was right to have
doubts.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Function for dealing with xlog data
Следующее
От: Jie Li
Дата:
Сообщение: small table left outer join big table