Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinTTJN8AW7F1oB3TefwQbt0fRxEb5M-ya7Ddgy=@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> To take the opposite approach... has anyone looked at having the OS just manage all caching for us? Something like
MMAPedshared buffers? Even if we find the issue with large shared buffers, we still can't dedicate serious amounts of
memoryto them because of work_mem issues. Granted, that's something else on the TODO list, but it really seems like
we'rere-inventing the wheels that the OS has already created here... 

The problem is that the OS doesn't offer any mechanism that would
allow us to obey the WAL-before-data rule.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: sync rep & fsync=off
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.