On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 30.11.2010 18:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Oh, but it's worse than that. When you XLOG a WAL record for each of
>>> those pages, you're going to trigger full-page writes for all of them.
>>> So now you've turned 1GB of data to write into 2+ GB of data to
>>> write.
>>
>> No, because only the first mod of each VM page would trigger a full page
>> write, at least assuming a reasonable ordering of the operations.
>
> If you change the LSN on the heap pages, you have to write full page images
> of those as well.
>
> Let's recap what happens when a VM bit is set: You set the PD_ALL_VISIBLE
> flag on the heap page (assuming it's not set already, it usually isn't), and
> then set the bit in the VM while keeping the heap page locked.
>
> Can we get away with not setting the LSN on the heap page, even though we
> set the PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag? If we don't set the LSN, the heap page can be
> flushed to disk before the WAL record, but I think that's fine because it's
> OK to have the flag set in the heap page even if the VM bit is not set.
I don't immediately see why that wouldn't work. As long as you bump
the LSN on the visibility map page, and also bump the LSN of the
visibility map page every time you clear a bit, I think you should be
OK.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company