On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:48, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> * pg_stat_replication
>> * pg_stat_standby (not yet)
>
> Just to keep the bikeshedding up, should it in this case not be
> pg_stat_replication_master and pg_stat_replication_standby or such?
> Replication applies to both master and slave...
The reason I didn't use term "master" is that pg_stat_replication is
information of *standby* servers on master server. Of course,
wal senders are processes in the master, but users probably think
they are the location standby servers receives.
I forgot to update SGML for the view. I'll do it soon.
Thanks for the heads-up.
--
Itagaki Takahiro