Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinO2Xm9c+szttMc3WpeU_CfAcymZK7rQk_8mAn3@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fair enough. How about increasing the default to 10 seconds?
>> Since bgwriter has already using 10s as a nap time if there is no
>> configured activity, I think that 10s is non-nonsense default value.
>
> What do we get out of making this non-configurable?

Which would make the setting of replication simpler, I think.
But I agree to just increase the default value of wal_sender_delay
rather than dropping it.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal