Re: bool: symbol name collision

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: bool: symbol name collision
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinM9e7g4rYXFI85eLFF4CPD1QUG5Vb_k4gOD9Lm@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bool: symbol name collision  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> The problem with the bool type is that it could have different sizes on
> different systems. =A0Which will lead to problems. =A0I doubt that that
> problem exists with int4.
>

I could imagine macros that do the wrong thing if the types they use
inside them have the wrong signedness...

I tihnk the reasons bool is particularly eggregious are a) we have
these misleading #ifdefs that don't do the right thing and b) there's
a stdbool.h making it hard for c99 programmers to avoid doing the
wrong thing. The other types are part of the postgres server interface
and module writers should just avoid redefining them -- if they do
they'll get errors. I think it would be nice to make that better but
at least they won't be silently redefining the postgres interfaces to
potentially incorrect definitions.

--=20
greg

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bool: symbol name collision
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bool: symbol name collision