Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinLAh5uFwJ5E4_K8JFrJK2TTTsVmBSdh1w8NJex@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> So... can we get back to coming up with a reasonable
>> definition,
>
> (1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O)
>
> (2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the
> PL.
>
> What else?

Doesn't subvert the general PostgreSQL security mechanisms?  Not sure
how to formulate that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?