On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:28, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
>>>> will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
>>>> export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
>>>> can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it
>>>> to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for
>>>> backbranches.
>>>
>>> We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
>>> releases.
>>
>> Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of
>> course)
>
> how exactly should people fix their BF members - is there any howto or such
> on how to deal with the new git2cvs gateway?
Andrew has posted info on how to convert them to git, I believe.
I don't think there are any for the git2cvs gateway, since it's not up yet.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/