<p>Sorry for top-posting... I was under the impression that git over http was just as efficient since 1.6.6
[1].<p>DavidBlewett<br /> 1. <a
href="http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support">http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support</a><br
/><p><blockquotetype="cite">On Sep 18, 2010 12:26 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" <<a href="mailto:andrew@dunslane.net"
target="_blank">andrew@dunslane.net</a>>wrote:<br /><br /><p><font color="#500050"><br /><br />On 09/18/2010 11:37
AM,Tom Lane wrote:<br /> ><br />> Andrew Dunstan wrote:<br />>>><br />>>> Test machines belong
in...</font> Right. I was just reacting to Bruce's observation about what people said about his moving off
BSD/OS.<p><fontcolor="#500050"><br /><br />> Bruce Momjian<<a href="mailto:bruce@momjian.us"
target="_blank">bruce@momjian.us</a>> writes:<br /> >><br />>> My big point in posting was to say that
compiling...</font>Yeah. Git over HTTP is horribly inefficient anyway - it's really a last resort.<br /><br />
cheers<br/><font color="#888888"><br /> andrew</font><p><font color="#500050"><br /><br />-- <br />Sent via
pgsql-hackersmailing list (<a href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"
target="_blank">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br/>To make changes to your sub...</font></blockquote>