Re: UNION DISTINCT in doc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: UNION DISTINCT in doc
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinDJOcjj=O4_NwiRQgdS=T81v9abmj5u7XQ5cVn@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на UNION DISTINCT in doc  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found PostgreSQL accepts UNION DISTINCT but documents don't mention it.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-select.html#SQL-UNION
>
> select_statement UNION [ ALL ] select_statement
>
> UNION DISTINCT is nothing more than UNION itself, but gram.y
> definitely accept it and the SQL standard describes it as well. Should
> we add DISTINCT to docs?

+1, with due regard for the issue raised by Tom.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample