On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 20:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be
>> renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream
>> is a lot more specific than that)
>
> What I like about streamrecv is it's fairly clear which end of the
> connection it's supposed to be used on. I find "pg_basebackup"
> quite lacking from that perspective, and the same for the names
> above. Or are you proposing to merge the send and receive sides
> into one executable?
No, the sending side is in walsender.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/