On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> I could use a brief reminder of how this bit fits into the
>> "serializable lock consistency" patch that's already sitting into
>> the CF queue as "Ready for Committer" though.
>
> [explanation]
The short version is that they are independent. The serializable lock
consistency patch, I think, a very important one, although I am not
entirely sure that I have the skill to do it justice. (I'm kinda
hoping Tom will commit it, but If he doesn't have time I may have to
take a crack at it.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company