Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Broersma
Тема Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTin5kq+m58gt6MpoezDk39vkuWQdfA93Xn=rZEn9@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers  (Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura@softperience.eu> wrote:

> If you want SQL COMPOSITE types, only one way to access them (as I think),
> is similarly, by get/set String. JDBC driver doesn't support custom mapping
> of UDT to Java classes.
>
> It's looks ODBC driver has better support for PSQL.

I think I understand.  Would you say that the underlying issue here is
the difference between the JDBC and ODBC specification?


--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Radosław Smogura
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers
Следующее
От: Kris Jurka
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug with DatabaseMetaData and temporary tables/schemas