Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTin1ZP+Jd5vttCxdp1j=sdF8HnN-bwpoMP8owu5U@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> I have no idea why it worked in the past, but the patch was never designed
> to work for UPSERT.  This has been discussed in the past and some people
> thought that that's not a huge deal.

I think it's expected to fail in some *concurrent* UPSERT cases.  It
should work if it's the only game in town.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoiding rewrite in ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: does anyone still care about synchronous replication?