On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> OK. I was thinking that instead moving this into
>> eval_const_expressions(), we just make the logic in
>> find_coercion_pathway() call the "exemptor" function (or whatever we
>> call it) right around here:
>
> No, no, no, no. Didn't you read yesterday's discussion? parse_coerce
> is entirely the wrong place for this.
I not only read it, I participated in it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company