On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of vie feb 25 12:28:25 -0300 2011:
>
>> no I wouldn't, and the pg_dump extra_float_digits setting addresses my
>> primary concern. =A0The client has a similar issue though -- suppose it
>> fetches a value from the server and updates it back -- which record
>> gets the update? =A0You would get different results if the client was
>> using binary or text features of the protocol. =A0Not saying this is
>> wrong or needs to be fixed, just pointing it out :-).
>>
>> update foo set val=3Dval + 1 where val =3D 2183.68;
>
> I think the mere idea of using floating point equality on a
> WHERE clause is bogus, regardless of text or binary format.
That's a bridge to far -- akin to saying floating point should not
support equality operator. select count(*) from foo where val >=3D
2183.68? you are ok getting different answers depending on method of
transmission of 2183.68 to the server?
merlin