Re: Include WAL in base backup
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Include WAL in base backup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimpoudScpUgu58GvWLMCuZZYpwtAxDJz6ZCXepM@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Include WAL in base backup (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Include WAL in base backup
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>> - Why not initialize logid and logseg like so?: >>> >>> int logid = startptr.xlogid; >>> int logseg = startptr.xrecoff / XLogSegSize; >>> >>> Then use those in your elog? Seems cleaner to me. > >> Hmm. Yes. Agreed. > > Marginal complaint here: int is the wrong type, I'm pretty sure. And, we should use XLByteToPrevSeg here instead of just =, I think. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: