On 21 July 2010 15:46, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 July 2010 14:32, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tried it. Still works for me. I'm on Linux, but I don't think it is the
>>>> issue :)
>>>
>>> Actually, it might be. pgRule::CanDrop() is calling schema->CanDrop(),
>>> however schema actually contains the table object. I think this is
>>> because rules can exist under tables and views, so originally deriving
>>> them from pgTableObject seemed wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> I create a rule on a view, it comes up with the "Drop/Delete" and
>> "Drop Cascaded" options.
>
> I've pushed a commit that should fix this (as well as some icon
> improvements that I previously forgot to push). You now get the option
> to drop a rule from a table or view (though not if it's "the" rule
> that implements the view), and no longer get the option to create
> rules on system views.
>
Cheers Dave :) Shame I never actually use rules myself, but I'm sure
many do. ;)
Thom