Thanks!<br /><br />I'll wait for the merging then; there is no point in benchmarking otherwise.<br /><br />Regards<br
/><br/><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Fujii Masao <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:masao.fujii@gmail.com">masao.fujii@gmail.com</a>></span>wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Wed,
Sep1, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <<a href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br
/>>> There are patches, and the latest from Fujii Masao is probably worth<br /> >> looking at :)<br />
><br/> > I am pretty sure, however, that the performance will be terrible at<br /> > this point. Heikki is
workingon fixing that, but it ain't done yet.<br /><br /></div>Yep. The latest WIP code is available in my git
repository,but it's<br /> not worth benchmarking yet. I'll need to merge Heikki's effort and<br /> the synchronous
replicationpatch.<br /><br /> git://<a href="http://git.postgresql.org/git/users/fujii/postgres.git"
target="_blank">git.postgresql.org/git/users/fujii/postgres.git</a><br/> branch: synchrep<br /><br /> Regards,<br
/><fontcolor="#888888"><br /> --<br /> Fujii Masao<br /> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION<br /> NTT Open
SourceSoftware Center<br /></font></blockquote></div><br />