Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimcmJdqDR5GSOh-iWAkUZkE+7M1mojY7iRF=RU3@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 19:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> We can be held responsible for the packaging decisions if they use
>> *our* "make install" commands, imho.
>
> Yep.

So, as I see it there are two ways of doing it - install a
catversion.h file and include it from libpq-fe.h, or modify the
libpq-fe.h. I still think modifying libpq-fe.h is the better of these
choices - but either of them would work. But is the catversion value
really the best interface for the user? This is about libpq
functionality level, which really has nothing to do with the backend
catalog, does it?


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: management of large patches
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sync Rep Design