Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimcWwPm7J9WGp1H_KcUlC3TZQhndBirFprjxiLb@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> My preference would be to stick to a style where we identify the
>> committer using the author tag and note the patch author, reviewers,
>> whether the committer made changes, etc. in the commit message.  A
>> single author field doesn't feel like enough for our workflow, and
>> having a mix of authors and committers in the author field seems like
>> a mess.
>
> Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the
> author field.

I hadn't realised that was possible until Guillaume did so on his
first commit to the new pgAdmin GIT repo. It seems to work nicely:

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=08e2826d90129bd4e4b3b7462bab682dd6a703e4

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronous replication
Следующее
От: Markus Wanner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory