On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:53, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C80D9B8.2020301@enterprisedb.com
>>
>> That just needs to be polished into shape, and documentation.
I have an updated version of this somewhere.IIRC it also needs things
like tablespace support, ubt it's well on it's way.
> Wow, cool! I don't know how but I've missed it.
Yes, especially since we discussed it in Stuttgart. I guess it may
have been during the party...
>> +1. Or maybe it would be better make it a separate binary, rather than part
>> of pg_ctl.
>
> Well the thinking was that nowadays we support initdb from pg_ctl, and
> this is another kind of initdb, really.
Yes, if it should go in any of the current binaries, initdb would be
the reasonable place, not pg_ctl ;)
That said, if we're going to wrap pg_streamrecv into 9.1 (which I
think we should), then *that* is where it should go.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/