On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that:
>
> psql -f one -f two -f three
>
> ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to:
>
> cat one two three > all
> psql -f all
>
> and it sounds like with this patch that's far from being the case.
Correct. Each is handled individually.
Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce
this back to the author?
gabrielle