Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jon Nelson
Тема Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimJmKx+3PZjO=7Z_d2Ts144RjnVh+RSYwfe9Aw5@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net> wrote:
>> No replies?
>>
>> This is another situation where using pread would have saved a lot of
>> time and sped things up a bit, but failing that, keeping track of the
>> file position ourselves and only lseek'ing when necessary would also
>> help. Postgresql was spending 37% of it's time in redundant lseek!
>
> 37% of cpu time?  Is that according to strace -T? how did you measure it?

Per the original post, it (redundant lseek system calls) accounted for
37% of the time spent in the kernel.

strace -f -p <pid> -c


--
Jon

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)
Следующее
От: Greg Spiegelberg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: how to get the total number of records in report