Re: Bug in parse_basebackup_options Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender options order-independent

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Bug in parse_basebackup_options Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender options order-independent
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTim=kJTgyCNSCQ3AwHWU5NthvOrGK+qkgC+x3FC3@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Bug in parse_basebackup_options Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender options order-independent  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:32, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Make walsender options order-independent
>>
>> While doing this, also move base backup options into
>> a struct instead of increasing the number of parameters
>> to multiple functions for each new option.
>
> When I read the include-WAL-in-backup patch, I found that this
> commit had the bug; parse_basebackup_options fails in parsing
> options because of wrong usage of MemSet. Here is the patch.

Wow. I know I fixed that at one point, it must've gone bad again in a
merge. Interestingly enough it works in my environment, but that must
be pure luck.

So thanks - applied.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lukas Eder
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Include WAL in base backup