Re: multiset patch review

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Itagaki Takahiro
Тема Re: multiset patch review
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTim7S-3v3DmeRiYt01oZnXd5oTT2tV3vovUmayUK@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: multiset patch review  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: multiset patch review  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 20:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I notice that this is adding keywords and syntax support for what is
> basically a PostgreSQL extension (since we certainly can't possibly be
> following the SQL standards given that we're not implementing a new
> datatype.  Is that really a good idea?

As I wrote here,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg00829.php
I think we can follow the SQL standard incrementally because we
have function overloads.

One exception is the result type of collect() aggregate function.
It returns an array for now, but will return a multiset when we
support true multiset data type.

--
Itagaki Takahiro


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multiset patch review
Следующее
От: Vangelis Katsikaros
Дата:
Сообщение: gist README