Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTim5K5xus7fmSXYFuVgMWWYEvYAzzEf2_yUmYHEF@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/10 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
>>> Is this method not reliable then?  Can something go wrong even if the
>>> user does exactly what the documentation says?
>>
>> It is not.  This whole discussion started from somebody reporting that
>> it didn't work.
>
> Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need,
> and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the
> main docs.  Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've
> collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1,
> THEN we put it in the main docs.
>
> We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup
> which isn't 100% tested.

Yeah.  This whole procedure sounds pretty flakey to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104