In the previous discussions of how to migrate from cvs to git, we've
all agreed we should kill the keyword expansion that we have now. I
don't think, however, that we ever decided what to do with the *old*
keywords. We did say we want to be able to reproduce backbranches/tags
*identically* to what they are now, which indicates we need to leave
the keywords in for those. That has other drawbacks, though.
The way I see it, we have two ways to do it:
1) We can migrate the repository with the keywords, and then make one big
commit just after (or before, that doesn't make a difference) removing
them. In this case, backbranches and tags look exactly like they do
now, but it also means if you do "git diff" between old versions, the
keywords will show up there.
2) We can filter out that row during the conversion, so they look like
they never existed.That means that if you check out 7.4.3 or whatever
fro git, it will look like the keyword lines never existed. Since
they're in comments it shouldn''t affect functionality, but it does mean
that we are *not* keeping history unmodified. The advantage is that
"git diff" on and between old revision won't include the keyword
changes, of course.
#1 is most likely the easiest one.
It really comes down to which is most important - being able to get
"easy to use diffs" between old revisions, or keeping history intact.
Obviously, for all *new* commits, either one of these two methods will
make the diffs readable. And if they are new commits, well, they are
by definition not history that needs to be kept :-)
Thoughts?
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/