2010/5/31 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So as far as I can tell, no one is opposed to replacing "expr AS name"
>>> with "name := expr" in the named-parameter syntax. Obviously we had
>>> better get this done before beta2. Is anyone actually working on the
>>> code/docs changes? If not, I'll pick it up.
>
>> If we eventually are going to want to support the ANSI standard "=>"
>> syntax, I am thinking we should just do it now. The larger question is
>> what justification do we have of not supporting "=>".
>
> Not breaking hstore, as well as any third-party modules that might be
> using that operator name. Did you not absorb any of the discussion
> so far?
>
can we search thise applications? I know only about hstore module. We
can ask people who use it in own applications. But every major version
of PostgreSQL can breaks compatibility - like 9.0 with variable names
in plpgsql.
Regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>