On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> You are just bumping up the storage cost. Part of the attraction of enums is
> their efficiency.
What's efficient about them? Aren't we using 4 bytes to store a value
that will nearly always fit in 2, if not 1?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company