Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTil3gLAg4rOxbOmedBH1_8EM94tm4W3INDsFMU-W@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Couldn't you apply this argument to any built-in immutable function whatsoever?
>
> No, only the ones that are built on top of other functions that aren't
> immutable.

Built on top of?  I don't get it.  It seems like anything of the form
immutablefunction(volatilefunction()) is vulnerable to this, and you
can give a volatile function as an argument to any function you like.
If you're saying we're testing for immutability by looking only at the
outermost function call, that seems pretty broken.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronous replication patch built on SR
Следующее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat