On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> but there is certainly no
>> open item for adding additional sync rep modes.
>
> In your opinion.
Well, as you just pointed out yourself a few minutes ago, I did write
the open item in question... I fancy I knew what I meant.
> I would prefer further feedback before solidifying this design, but if
> we must solidify it now, then I prefer to do that with all 5 options.
> As originally submitted for this commit fest.
Even if it were true that these options were in the patch submitted
for this CommitFest, that wouldn't be a reason to commit them now,
because the CommitFest is over and has been for several weeks. But it
turns out they weren't.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1295127631.3282.100.camel@ebony
+/*
+ * Queuing code is written to allow later extension to multiple
+ * queues. Currently, we use just one queue (==FSYNC).
+ *
+ * XXX We later expect to have RECV, FSYNC and APPLY modes.
+ */
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company