Re: Why facebook used mysql ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikrUGMHfdUvH05c8Dffytn8FAXFg=E_mD4=fdT7@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why facebook used mysql ?  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Ответы Re: Why facebook used mysql ?  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:12 PM, David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think you should be looking at process partitioning and core
> affinity unless you have already proved that
> you have processes that don't scale over the cores you have, to deliver the
> throughput you need.

Note that you're likely to get FAR more out of processor affinity with
multiple NICs assigned each to its own core / set of cores that share
L3 cache and such.    Having the nics and maybe RAID controllers and /
or fibre channel cards etc on their own set of cores in one group can
make a big difference.

Processor affinity doesn't seem to make much difference for me with
pgsql.  Modern linux schendulers are pretty good at keeping things on
the same core for a while without predefined affinity.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thoughts on a surrogate key lookup function?
Следующее
От: David Boreham
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why facebook used mysql ?