On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> we gain something quite specific and tangible, namely, the
>> expectation that patch authors will stay on top of their patches
>> if they want them reviewed by the community.
>
> Barring some operational emergency here, I'll be reviewing the
> status of all the open patches in the CF today. If I can't find any
> new posting by the author for the patch in question, I'll mark it
> Returned With Feedback. I'll probably be cracking the whip on a few
> others, one way or another. If anyone wonders why I don't do so for
> certain patches, it will probably be because I've had off-list
> messages about needing more time to do a proper review or being in
> transit and unable to do more than post short emails at the moment.
>
> I do request that all authors and reviewers make an effort to keep
> the CF app page up-to-date. If you're not sure all recent patches,
> reviews, and significant comment posts are reflected in the app for
> a patch for which you're an author or reviewer, please check as soon
> as possible and make it right; it's save time for me and will help
> keep the process moving smoothly.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company