On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> > I think users would rather have the restore fail, and know right away
>> > they have an issue, than to do the upgrade, and find out later that so=
me
>> > of their application queries fail and they need to run around fixing
>> > them. ?(FYI, pg_upgrade would use the new pg_dump and would not fail.)
>> >
>> > In a way, the fact that the restore fails can be seen as a feature ---
>> > they get the error before the go live on 8.4. ?(Yeah, I am serious.)
>>
>> Eeh, I've had this happen to me on earlier releases, and it didn't
>> feel like a feature to me. =A0YMMV, of course.
>
> Would you have preferred later application failure?
YES! It's a heck of a lot easier to fix the application than it is to
doctor the dump output with vi.
--=20
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company