Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jaime Casanova
Тема Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikWAJ0mie2sHSxLBYkx7u21=X1cj9wb1zXe6zyr@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> this patch implement a new iteration construct - iteration over an
> array. The sense of this new iteration is:
>  * a simple and cleaner syntax

i will start the review of this one... but before that sorry for
suggesting this a bit later but about using UNNEST as part of the
sintax?

FOR var IN UNNEST array_expr LOOP
END LOOP

i like this because:
1) is cleaner when array_expr is ARRAY[1,2,3]
2) is not legal now to use the unnest() function without a SELECT in
the context of a FOR loop (or am i missing something?)
3) the unnest() function does the same so seems intuitive what a
FOR-IN-UNNEST do

what i don't know if is this syntax could co-exist with the unnest() function?

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Label switcher function