Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikM2VpD3baVgU+8tgWXfeTQrHBhgpw9RzEWCk-1@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> * Oleg Bartunov (oleg@sai.msu.su) wrote:
>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
>
> It sure seems like
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> should be improved, in general..  If this module is really still just a
> test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..

I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I
don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch.  However, "us
reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multiset patch review