On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Marti Raudsepp's message of lun feb 14 19:39:25 -0300 2011:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:13, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> > The patch had a trivial conflict in planner.c, plus plenty of offsets. I've
>> > attached the rebased patch that I used for review. For anyone following along,
>> > all the interesting hunks touch heapam.c; the rest is largely mechanical. A
>> > "diff -w" patch is also considerably easier to follow.
>>
>> Here's a simple patch for the RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() function,
>> as explained in my last post. I don't know if it's any help to you,
>> but since I wrote it I might as well send it up. This applies on top
>> of Noah's rebased patch.
>
> Got it, thanks.
>
>> I did some tests and it seems to work, although I also hit the same
>> visibility bug as Noah.
>
> Yeah, that bug is fixed with the attached, though I am rethinking this
> bit.
I am thinking that the statute of limitations has expired on this
patch, and that we should mark it Returned with Feedback and continue
working on it for 9.2. I know it's a valuable feature, but I think
we're out of time.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company