Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikCw54bT_1N7bMm3eJtO+ypx4UFf+x9Zmgf7ezr@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на back branches vs. VS 2008  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: back branches vs. VS 2008  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 18:15, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using Visual
> Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really know why.
> HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But those branches branches fail with a
> complaint about IPPROTO_IPV6 being undefined.
>
> The patch seems harmless enough. But I'd like to know why it's happening.
> Does anyone have a clue?

Umm. Since when do we backpatch new features/platforms?

I don't know exactly why that is happening, but it's a good indicator
that backpatching it isn't necessarily safe - what else can be missed?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: back branches vs. VS 2008
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid