Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
| От | Itagaki Takahiro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTik9sL0oV=VxjNRaY1mvv2D9Z6QmofSyr0ADL6dy@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 19:00, Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: > But EndCopyFrom() seems not to be able to release memory which is > allocated in BeginCopy() and BeginCopyFrom(). I found this behavior > by executing a query which generates nested loop plan (outer 1000000 > row * inner 10 row), and at last postgres grows up to 300MB+ from > 108MB (VIRT of top command). > > Attached patch would avoid this leak by adding per-copy context to > CopyState. This would be overkill, and ResetCopyFrom() might be > reasonable though. Good catch. I merged your fix into the attached patch. BTW, why didn't planner choose a materialized plan for the inner loop? FDW scans are typically slower than heap scans or TupleTableslot scans, it seems reasonable for me to add a Materialize node at the top of the inner Foreign Scan, especially when we don't use indexes for the scan keys or join keys. -- Itagaki Takahiro
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: