On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
> On Dec15, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
>>> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
>>>>>> - serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs
>>>>>> rebasing. I don't have time to deal with it right away. That sucks,
>>>>>> because I think this is a really important change.
>>>>> I can try to find some time to update the patch if it suffers from bit-rot. Would that help?
>>>>
>>>> Yes!
>>>
>>> I've rebased the patch to the current HEAD, and re-run my FK concurrency test suite,
>>> available from https://github.com/fgp/fk_concurrency, to verify that things still work.
>>
>> Thanks, but, EWRONGTHREAD.
>
> Sorry for that. I wasn't sure whether to post this here or into the original thread,
> and it seems I ended up on the losing side of that 50-50 chance ;-)
>
> Want me to repost there, or just remember to use the correct thread next time?
Nah, don't bother reposting. It'd be helpful if you could add a link
to that message on the CF app though.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company