On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 13:10, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
>>>> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything
>>>> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should
>>>> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to
>>>> rebase or translate some old notes.
>>>
>>> Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week)
>>> but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed
>>> deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.
>>
>> I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good.
>>
>> How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september
>> 2011" because that's a year after we made the switch?
>
> Either of those would be fine with me.
Let's just decide it's "when 9.1 is released".
And I put it on you to remind me when the time comes ;)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/