Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От LWATCDR
Тема Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=ziMkS1LOgtz1Z0OkU5ec82LKKsdkNBx9HE5=3@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-novice
I have used Postgres a bit and actually use it as the back end for a
program we use at my office. Truth is that it has worked so well that
I have not had to mess with it for years at a time and then only to
move to a new server or update. I have no experience with Oracle at
all. Since I work with small datasets of only a few hundred thousand
records to a million records and only a handful of tables Postgres
does everything we need here. Right now it is supporting 50 users and
running on a P3 600 with a single hard drive and 512 MB of ram. Yes
the response time is "human instant".
So I am wondering what features does Postgres lack to equal Oracle or
DB2?  This is more for my own satisfaction since I can not imagine any
uses here that wouldn't run on a modern hexcore server with a few
gigabytes of ram and a raid of SATA drives.

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Running both PG 8 and PG 9
Следующее
От: "Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?